Difference between revisions of "Ivor Lewis esophagectomy"
From WikiAnesthesia
Nirav Kamdar (talk | contribs) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox surgical procedure | {{Infobox surgical procedure | ||
| anesthesia_type = General | | anesthesia_type = General | ||
| airway = DLT | | airway = DLT / bronchial blocker | ||
| lines_access = Large PIV, arterial line, NG tube | | lines_access = Large PIV, arterial line, NG tube | ||
| monitors = Standard, arterial line | | monitors = Standard, arterial line | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The Ivor-Lewis transthoracic esophagectomy can be used to resect cancers in the lower third of the esophagus. It is not the optimal approach for cancers located in the middle third because of the limited proximal margin that can be achieved. This procedure combines a laparotomy with a right thoracotomy and an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. This approach permits direct visualization of the thoracic esophagus and allows the surgeon to perform a full thoracic lymphadenectomy. | |||
== Preoperative management == | == Preoperative management == | ||
=== Operating room setup<!-- Describe any unique aspects of operating room preparation. Avoid excessively granular information. Use drug classes instead of specific drugs when appropriate. If none, this section may be removed. --> === | === Operating room setup<!-- Describe any unique aspects of operating room preparation. Avoid excessively granular information. Use drug classes instead of specific drugs when appropriate. If none, this section may be removed. --> === | ||
* Arterial line +/- flowtrack | * Arterial line +/- flowtrack (ideally on left arm) | ||
* Fluid warmer | * Fluid warmer | ||
* Double-lumen tube | * Double-lumen tube (left) / bronchial blocker with SLT | ||
=== | === Regional and neuraxial techniques<!-- Describe any potential regional and/or neuraxial techniques which may be used for this case. If none, this section may be removed. --> === | ||
* Thoracic epidural (T7-8 commonly) | |||
== Intraoperative management == | == Intraoperative management == | ||
Line 64: | Line 31: | ||
=== Induction and airway management<!-- Describe the important considerations and general approach to the induction of anesthesia and how the airway is typically managed for this case. --> === | === Induction and airway management<!-- Describe the important considerations and general approach to the induction of anesthesia and how the airway is typically managed for this case. --> === | ||
* May consider RSI if high-aspiration risk due to esophageal tumor obstructing food passage | |||
* Left sided double lumen tube or single lumen ETT with bronchial blocker for one lung ventilation | |||
* NGT placed after airway management | |||
=== Positioning<!-- Describe any unique positioning considerations, including potential intraoperative position changes. If none, this section may be removed. --> === | === Positioning<!-- Describe any unique positioning considerations, including potential intraoperative position changes. If none, this section may be removed. --> === | ||
* Start in supine position if EGD is used at the beginning of the case | |||
* Patient will be later positioned to left lateral decubitus for the thoracic portion of the resection | |||
=== Maintenance and surgical considerations<!-- Describe the important considerations and general approach to the maintenance of anesthesia, including potential complications. Be sure to include any steps to the surgical procedure that have anesthetic implications. --> === | === Maintenance and surgical considerations<!-- Describe the important considerations and general approach to the maintenance of anesthesia, including potential complications. Be sure to include any steps to the surgical procedure that have anesthetic implications. --> === | ||
==== Abdominal Dissection ==== | |||
* Pt is placed supine and peritoneal cavity is examined for metastatic disease | |||
* Lower portion of the stomach is mobilized | |||
* Gastric conduit formed | |||
* A cervical anastomosis is performed and esophagus and stomach returned to mediastinum | |||
=== Emergence<!-- List and/or describe any important considerations related to the emergence from anesthesia for this case. --> === | === Emergence<!-- List and/or describe any important considerations related to the emergence from anesthesia for this case. --> === | ||
Line 74: | Line 56: | ||
=== Disposition<!-- List and/or describe the postoperative disposition and any special considerations for transport of patients for this case. --> === | === Disposition<!-- List and/or describe the postoperative disposition and any special considerations for transport of patients for this case. --> === | ||
* Post-op ICU | |||
=== Pain management<!-- Describe the expected level of postoperative pain and approaches to pain management for this case. --> === | === Pain management<!-- Describe the expected level of postoperative pain and approaches to pain management for this case. --> === | ||
Line 80: | Line 64: | ||
=== Potential complications<!-- List and/or describe any potential postoperative complications for this case. --> === | === Potential complications<!-- List and/or describe any potential postoperative complications for this case. --> === | ||
# Anastomotic leak | |||
# Vocal cord paresis | |||
# Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury | |||
# Morbidity requiring re-operation | |||
# Mortality | |||
== Procedure variants<!-- This section should only be used for cases with multiple approaches (e.g. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy). Otherwise, remove this section. Use this table to very briefly compare and contrast various aspects between approaches. Add or remove rows as needed to maximize relevance. Consider using symbols rather than words when possible (e.g. +, –, additional symbols such as ↑ and ↓ are available using the "Ω" tool in the editor). --> == | == Procedure variants<!-- This section should only be used for cases with multiple approaches (e.g. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy). Otherwise, remove this section. Use this table to very briefly compare and contrast various aspects between approaches. Add or remove rows as needed to maximize relevance. Consider using symbols rather than words when possible (e.g. +, –, additional symbols such as ↑ and ↓ are available using the "Ω" tool in the editor). --> == | ||
Line 97: | Line 87: | ||
|Position | |Position | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Supine followed by left | ||
lateral decubitus | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 111: | Line 103: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Postoperative disposition | |Postoperative disposition | ||
| | |ICU | ||
| | |ICU or ERAS | ||
| | |ICU or ERAS | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pain management | |Pain management | ||
| | |Thoracic Epidural | ||
| | |Thoracic Epidural | ||
| | |Thoracic Epidural | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Potential complications | |Potential complications | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Anastamotic leak (4.3%) | ||
Vocal cord paresis (0.9%) | |||
Mortality (1.68%)<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Luketich|first=James D.|last2=Pennathur|first2=Arjun|last3=Awais|first3=Omar|last4=Levy|first4=Ryan M.|last5=Keeley|first5=Samuel|last6=Shende|first6=Manisha|last7=Christie|first7=Neil A.|last8=Weksler|first8=Benny|last9=Landreneau|first9=Rodney J.|last10=Abbas|first10=Ghulam|last11=Schuchert|first11=Matthew J.|date=2012-07|title=Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22668811|journal=Annals of Surgery|volume=256|issue=1|pages=95–103|doi=10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603|issn=1528-1140|pmc=4103614|pmid=22668811}}</ref> | |||
| | | | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 05:55, 1 July 2022
Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
Anesthesia type |
General |
---|---|
Airway |
DLT / bronchial blocker |
Lines and access |
Large PIV, arterial line, NG tube |
Monitors |
Standard, arterial line |
Primary anesthetic considerations | |
Preoperative | |
Intraoperative | |
Postoperative | |
Article quality | |
Editor rating | |
User likes | 0 |
The Ivor-Lewis transthoracic esophagectomy can be used to resect cancers in the lower third of the esophagus. It is not the optimal approach for cancers located in the middle third because of the limited proximal margin that can be achieved. This procedure combines a laparotomy with a right thoracotomy and an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. This approach permits direct visualization of the thoracic esophagus and allows the surgeon to perform a full thoracic lymphadenectomy.
Preoperative management
Operating room setup
- Arterial line +/- flowtrack (ideally on left arm)
- Fluid warmer
- Double-lumen tube (left) / bronchial blocker with SLT
Regional and neuraxial techniques
- Thoracic epidural (T7-8 commonly)
Intraoperative management
Monitoring and access
- Invasive hemodynamic monitoring
- Large bore IV access
Induction and airway management
- May consider RSI if high-aspiration risk due to esophageal tumor obstructing food passage
- Left sided double lumen tube or single lumen ETT with bronchial blocker for one lung ventilation
- NGT placed after airway management
Positioning
- Start in supine position if EGD is used at the beginning of the case
- Patient will be later positioned to left lateral decubitus for the thoracic portion of the resection
Maintenance and surgical considerations
Abdominal Dissection
- Pt is placed supine and peritoneal cavity is examined for metastatic disease
- Lower portion of the stomach is mobilized
- Gastric conduit formed
- A cervical anastomosis is performed and esophagus and stomach returned to mediastinum
Emergence
Postoperative management
Disposition
- Post-op ICU
Pain management
- Epidural
Potential complications
- Anastomotic leak
- Vocal cord paresis
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
- Morbidity requiring re-operation
- Mortality
Procedure variants
Open | Laparoscopic | Robotic | |
---|---|---|---|
Unique considerations | |||
Position | Supine followed by left
lateral decubitus |
||
Surgical time | |||
EBL | |||
Postoperative disposition | ICU | ICU or ERAS | ICU or ERAS |
Pain management | Thoracic Epidural | Thoracic Epidural | Thoracic Epidural |
Potential complications | Anastamotic leak (4.3%)
Vocal cord paresis (0.9%) Mortality (1.68%)[1] |
References
- ↑ Luketich, James D.; Pennathur, Arjun; Awais, Omar; Levy, Ryan M.; Keeley, Samuel; Shende, Manisha; Christie, Neil A.; Weksler, Benny; Landreneau, Rodney J.; Abbas, Ghulam; Schuchert, Matthew J. (2012-07). "Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients". Annals of Surgery. 256 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603. ISSN 1528-1140. PMC 4103614. PMID 22668811. Check date values in:
|date=
(help)
Top contributors: Nirav Kamdar and Olivia Sutton