Search results
From WikiAnesthesia
File:Inouye The Lancet 2014 Delirium in elderly.pdf (matches file content) Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18: 117–27. 919 Review 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 920 Wilson(1,240 × 1,665 (173 KB)) - 00:39, 17 May 2022
File:Post Op Part II.pdf (matches file content) review procedurespecific concerns after cardiac surgery and the management of common complications. We also discuss performance improvement and outcome assurance(1,218 × 1,631 (755 KB)) - 00:35, 17 May 2022
File:Post Op Part 1.pdf (matches file content) coronary artery bypass, cardiac valve, and aortic procedures, is among the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Successful outcomes(1,218 × 1,631 (557 KB)) - 00:36, 17 May 2022
File:Maldonado Crit Care Clin 2017 - Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome Algorithms.pdf (matches file content) the anticonvulsant (P 5 .02) � Side-effects was less common in the ACAgroup (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.31–1.02) Minozzi et al,102 2010 Various, Cochrane Review(900 × 1,350 (1.37 MB)) - 00:34, 17 May 2022
File:VAE Review Mirski Anesthesiology 2007.pdf (matches file content) the common relation between clinical presentation and acute embolism volume is presented in figure 1. Cardiovascularly, tachyarrhythmias are common, and(1,218 × 1,631 (778 KB)) - 07:57, 17 October 2022
File:ASA-SOAP Practice Guidelines 2018.pdf (matches file content) 85.0* 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3* 21.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 33.3* 18.3 18.3 1.7 91.7* 83.3* 8.3 10.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7 58.3* 36(1,218 × 1,631 (487 KB)) - 00:36, 17 May 2022
File:Brain Trauma Foundation 2016 - Severe TBI Guidelines.pdf (matches file content) cEEG:5/34 vs. 3/18, p=1.0 N=52 89% with TBI Seizure at 6 months: 1/20 vs. 0/14, p=1.0 LEV=34 Mortality 14/34 vs. 4/18, p=0.227. PHT=18 Average GOS at 6(1,275 × 1,650 (1.46 MB)) - 00:38, 17 May 2022
File:Cohen - Lumbar Facet Guidelines.pdf (matches file content) were included in any group (table 7).156–159 Sedation was achieved with saline in up to half of the individuals,159 and the authors concluded that saline(1,240 × 1,653 (1.96 MB)) - 06:24, 20 March 2023
File:IV Lidocaine Cochrane Review 2018.pdf (matches file content) 28 18 (13) 30 18 (18) 4.5 % 0.0 [ -0.52, 0.52 ] Wuethrich 2012 32 0 (1.48) 32 0 (0.74) 4.7 % 0.0 [ -0.49, 0.49 ] Herroeder 2007 31 2.2(1,239 × 1,650 (3.11 MB)) - 00:35, 17 May 2022
File:Consensus Guidelines for PONV A&A Jan 2014.pdf (matches file content) reduces the incidence in that population to 42% (ARR = 18). This means that approximately 6 patients (1/0.18) need to be treated with antiemetics for one to stay(1,218 × 1,631 (904 KB)) - 00:40, 17 May 2022
File:RA in anticoagulated patient- ASRA 2018 guidlines.pdf (matches file content) epidural night of surgery, epidural catheter removed catheter (18 h); 6-h interval between 18 h after rivaroxaban; rivaroxaban repeated catheter removal and(1,162 × 1,612 (914 KB)) - 00:32, 17 May 2022
File:Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012 Guidelines for Intrathecal Medication Delivery Systems.pdf (matches file content) infusion of 163 patients by 19 physicians. Pain 1987;31:211–223. 113. Ramsey CN, Owen RD, Witt WO, Grider JS. Intrathecal granuloma in a patient receiving high(1,237 × 1,631 (636 KB)) - 15:39, 7 March 2024
File:Schizmodos.pdf (matches file content) AP. The relationship between 13 754 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Journal of Anesthesia (2020)(1,240 × 1,647 (1.15 MB)) - 12:13, 25 August 2022
File:Essentials of Our Current Understanding .Abdominal Wall.pdf (matches file content) group (2.7 vs 2.3). Sig lower morphine use in TAP vs control group at 24 h (18 vs 31.5 mg). Sig shorter time to 1st opioid use in TAP vs control group (median(1,162 × 1,612 (2.59 MB)) - 00:33, 17 May 2022
File:11-27 Abdominal wall blocks.pdf (matches file content) group (2.7 vs 2.3). Sig lower morphine use in TAP vs control group at 24 h (18 vs 31.5 mg). Sig shorter time to 1st opioid use in TAP vs control group (median(1,162 × 1,612 (2.4 MB)) - 00:31, 17 May 2022
File:Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys AMEE Guide No 102.pdf (matches file content) participants, and using different survey modalities (e.g. paper and email). Common ways to evaluate nonresponse bias are to: � Compare answers between early(1,321 × 1,735 (434 KB)) - 00:41, 17 May 2022
File:Medical education scholarship An introductory guide AMEE Guide No 89.pdf (matches file content) Fax: +706 713 2222; E-mail: gcrites@uga.edu ISSN 0142-159X print/ISSN 1466-187X online/14/80657–18 ß 2014 Informa UK Ltd. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.916791(1,321 × 1,735 (454 KB)) - 00:35, 17 May 2022