Liver transplant

Liver transplant

Anesthesia type	General
Airway	ETT
Lines and access	Large bore IVs Arterial line Central line Introducer / PAC
Monitors	Standard 5-lead ECG Temperature Urine output ABP CVP PAP EEG TEE
Primary anesthetic considerations
Preoperative	Encepholapthy Multi-organ system derangements
Intraoperative	Decreased anesthetic requirement Systemic vasodilation Decreased hepatic metabolism Hemorrhage Thrombocytopenia Coagulopathy Renal insufficiency Hypo/hyperglycemia
Postoperative	Hemorrhage
Article quality
Editor rating	Comprehensive
User likes	3

A liver transplant is performed in adult or pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease.

For living donor hepatic resection, see Hepatectomy for living donor liver transplant

Overview

Indications

Liver transplant is indicated in patients with end-stage liver failure. Reasons for liver failure are many and include acute fulminant hepatitis, inborn errors of metabolism, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, chronic hepatitis B or C, alpha-1 antitrypsin disease, Wilson's disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Surgical procedure

Liver transplantation is a complex surgical procedure that can be separated into three distinct phases :

1. Dissection (hepatectomy) phase
   • This encompasses everything from skin incision to clamping of the IVC, portal vein, and hepatic artery.
   • The predominant portion of this case involves dissection of the recipient's native liver.
   • Blood loss during this phase of the surgery is significant and may be worse in patients with severe portal hypertension, coagulopathy, previous abdominal operations, recent recurrent or severe peritonitis, or history of upper abdominal radiation therapy.
   • Mobilization of the liver during dissection may partially or completely occlude the IVC causing a drop in blood pressure
2. Anhepatic phase
   • This encompasses the time from clamping of hepatic venous inflow until the graft is portal venous reperfusion.
   • During this stage of the operation, the donor liver is implanted into the recipient.
   • The IVC may be completely or partially clamped during this phase of the operation, limiting venous return to the right atrium.
   • Hemodynamically unstable patients may benefit from veno-veno bypass.
     • Involves placement of cannulas in the femoral and portal veins that empty into the axillary or jugular vein, which maintains venous return.
3. Post-revascularization (neo-hepatic) phase
   • This phase begins with removal of the vascular clamps.
   • Reperfusion of the liver may result in a temporarily hyperkalemia from liver cell lysis, and preservative solution.
   • Massive air embolism is also a major immediate concern during reperfusion.
   • This stage may rarely be complicated by severe pHTN resulting in right heart failure and low systemic pressures.
   • Reperfusion also frequently results in systemic hypotension likely from kinins, and cytokines from the liver allograft.
   • Prior to reperfusion patients are given 250-1000mg of methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone that acts as an immunosuppressant and helps to blunt the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury of the liver.
   • After initial stabilization, this phase involves hepatic artery and bile duct reconstruction.
   • Following hepatic artery reconstruction, MAP should be maintained above 65 mm Hg to prevent hepatic artery thrombosis.
   • A feeding G-tube may be placed at the end of the case. An OG or NG tube is typically placed and confirmed prior the end of this phase.

Preoperative management

Patient evaluation

Patient with advanced and decompensated liver disease suffer secondary injury and varying degrees of dysfunction in the majority of vital organs and organ processes. It is essential to thoroughly review laboratory, imaging, additional diagnostics, history, and recent medical course, to best anticipate this dysfunction and optimally manage your patient in the operating theatre. Our preoperative checklist provides a step-wise and systemic approach to preoperative evaluation of these patients.

System	Considerations
Neurologic	Patients with liver disease are at risk for encephalopathy. Mental status may be further depressed by coexisting metabolic derangements, including hyponatremia and hypoglycemia. The failure of hepatic clearance of various toxins, such as ammonia, can lead to alterations in endogenous neurotransmitters and neuro-signaling pathways, largely involving y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate and nitric oxide. Anesthetic requirements for patients with end-stage liver disease will often be reduced, due to underlying cerebral disturbances. Acute fulminant hepatic failure may be accompanied by elevated intracranial pressure and varying degrees of coma. Preoperative placement of intracranial pressure monitors may guide peri-operative neuroprotective strategies, with the goal to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. Patients may be unable to consent for surgery, and may exhibit delayed emergence following anesthesia. A thorough baseline neurologic and mental status exam is necessary prior to surgery, to assist with assessment following transplantation and anesthetic exposure.
Cardiovascular	Systemic circulatory changes result in a hyperkinetic blood flow in most vascular beds, resulting in increased cardiac output and elevated circulating blood volume. Nitric oxide, cannabinoids, and cGMP have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this state. This is often further associated with lower PVR to accommodate this dynamic circulatory state. Systemic vasodilation results from circulation of vasoactive mediators and vasodilators, as well as low grade endotoxin, which are not cleared by the compromised liver. Due to high circulating blood volume, many patients will have elevated filling pressures, reflected as high CVP, PCWP and PADP. However, transpulmonary pressure gradients are often normal. Decompensated liver failure is often accompanied by some degree of diastolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence and catecholamine insensitivity. A common finding on ECG is prolongation of QTc. When pronounced care must be taken to avoid medications known to prolong the QT interval. Magnesium levels should be maintained greater than 2 mg/dl. A subset of patients will manifest signs of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, further characterized by conduction abnormalities/rhythm disturbances, alterations in calcium handling at the myocyte level and depressed myocardial performance. A very small subset of patients will have pulmonary hypertension, a pathological condition defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of greater than 25 mm Hg at rest, with a PCWP less than 15 mm Hg, and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) further includes presence of portosystemic shunt. It is essential for portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) to be identified early, as significant perioperative mortality exists in patients with severe disease (mPAP>45, with associated elevation in PVR). There is a general consensus that there is a prohibitively high risk of intra and postoperative mortality in patients with mPAP> 45 mm Hg and PVR that exceeds 250 dynes/s/cm-5 . Early referral for initiation of pulmonary vasodilators (ie prostacyclin, PDE5 inhibitor, endothelin antagonist) is recommended, to evaluate response to therapy/disease reversibility and candidacy for future liver transplantation. Associated right ventricular dysfunction may recover, but correlates with severity of pressure overload. Echocardiography is routinely performed to evaluate RV function, LV systolic function, and measure RVSP. In the presence of elevated RVSP, right heart catheterization will be performed to assess RV function, measure cardiac output, and determine presence of elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance. If the diagnosis of PPHTN is made, treatment can be initiated and transplantation may be deferred. A favorable response to vasodilators is ideal, as this indicates presence of a reactive pulmonary bed and confers potential therapeutic options in the event of a precipitous rise in pulmonary artery pressures intraoperatively (application of inhaled nitric oxide or epoprostenol). Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an ideal preoperative screening assessment, as it can identify metabolic imbalance and ischemic risk, as well as underlying structural abnormalities. This test has a negative predictive value of 92-97%, with a negative test predicting good prognosis and low likelihood of major adverse cardiac events (Donovan et al, 1996; Cotton et al, 2002). If ischemic changes are present, a left heart catheterization should be performed to determine presence of severe coronary arteriopathy that may warrant intervention (angioplasty/stent v revascularization) prior to transplantation. The presence of coronary artery disease is associated with higher morbidity and mortality (Plotkin et al, 1996).
Pulmonary	Pulmonary abnormalities are common in patients with advanced liver disease. Presence of intrapulmonary shunt, ventilation-perfusion defects, and abnormalities in lung compliance are frequently encountered. Many transplant recipients are of advanced age, and thus have changes in FRC, closing capacity, and lung elasticity which may result in challenges with ventilation and gas exchange. Restrictive lung disease, largely secondary to presence of ascites and pleural effusions, may be noted during positive pressure ventilation. Careful attention is necessary during induction of anesthesia, to optimize patient position and pre-oxygenation, to mitigate ensuing hypoxemia that may occur during brief apnea. Lung protective ventilation with appropriately calculated tidal volume (6-8 cc/kg PBW) and application of PEEP should be employed during surgery, to minimize ventilator induced lung injury. Hypoxemia may be present secondary to hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) which, if severe, may persist for months following transplantation. HPS may present as asymptomatic cyanosis, though patients often endorse platypnea and orthodeoxia. Etiology is likely related to elaboration of vasoactive mediators (ie nitric oxide), which result in formation of abnormal pulmonary vascular communications, resulting in A-V shunt. This diagnosis can be confirmed by echocardiogram with “bubble” study, which will reveal presence of bubbles/agitated saline in the left atrium, 3-5 cycles after injection. Some correction of hypoxemia with 100% oxygen confers a favorable post-operative prognosis.
Gastrointestinal	Portal hypertension is present in the majority of patients receiving liver transplantation. This may manifest as severe GI bleed, gastric and esophageal varices, ascites, and previous portosystemic shunts. All patients with decompensated liver disease are at risk for delayed gastric emptying and, as such, rapid sequence intubation is strongly encouraged. Close attention to ascitic drainage during dissection is essential, and volume replacement with colloid rich solution is generally pursued to minimize hemodynamic changes associated with rapid fluid shifts. The presence of severe cirrhosis and portal hypertension often leads to engorgement of collateral vessels in the splanchnic and portal circulation, which may increase risk of massive bleeding during the dissection phase and vascular/hepatic mobilization. Ongoing GI bleed may continue intra-operatively. Some clinicians advocate management with octreotide to mitigate bleeding risk. Appropriate blood product transfusions and volume replacement is necessary in response to signs of ongoing bleeding and hypovolemia.
Hematologic	The predominant hematologic abnormality in patients awaiting liver transplantation is anemia. This results from occult or clinical bleeding, malnutrition/malabsorption, hemolysis, and reduced production red blood cells production, often exacerbated by co-existing renal disease. Thrombocytopenia secondary to thrombopoietin deficiency and splenic sequestration is common in patients with portal hypertension, and functional platelet defects may be exacerbated by uremia. Coagulation defects result from reduced production of clotting factors and inhibitors, vitamin K deficiency, abnormalities in fibrinolysis, and reduced clearance of activated factors (Amitrano et al, 2002; Kawasaki at al, 1999; Ingeberg et al 1985; Rubin et al, 1979). Associated trauma (secondary to surgery), sepsis, bleeding, or shock, may result in secondary fibrinolysis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Deficiencies in inhibitors and serine proteases, such as plasminogen activator inhibitor, may increase risk for thrombosis in certain patients. Many individuals with biliary disease and associated autoimmune pathology, may have concomitant hypercoagulable conditions, increasing risk of vascular thrombosis after re-perfusion. Due to the complexity of hematologic derangements, it is imperative to approach transfusion strategies in a data-driven and clinically influenced manner. Interpretation of TEG, as well as clinical bleeding or hypercoagulability in the surgical field, should be primary variables used to impact decisions regarding transfusion with plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate and administration of recombinant synthetic factors. Catastrophic consequences of inappropriate transfusion strategies include hepatic artery thrombosis with subsequent graft failure.
Renal	Many patients with end-stage liver disease will have associated renal insufficiency or renal failure. Generally patients with chronic renal failure will be listed for combined liver-kidney transplantation. Etiology of renal failure is often multifactorial, and related to relative hypoperfusion of the renal bed with acute kidney injury, acute tubular necrosis related to medication administration (contrast, etc), and possible acute interstitial nephritis. Patients may carry the diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), which occurs as a result of intense renal vasoconstriction prompted by renin-angiotensin activation in response to profound splanchnic vasodilation. HRS is often reversible with liver transplantation. Some patients will require acute hemodialysis in the period prior to transplantation. It is essential to determine associated anuria/oliguria, clinical response to diuretic therapy, associated metabolic derangements, and volume status in this patient population. Patients may require dialysis prior to commencement of transplant. It is rare to utilize intraoperative RRT, however, acute changes in potassium secondary to transfusion and reduced clearance, may warrant this therapy. Our strategy to manage this select patient population involves: limitation of exogenous potassium administration, red blood cell washing by perfusion prior to administration, gentle supplementation with bicarbonate containing fluids, possible diuretic challenge, and close monitoring of electrolytes. Crystalloid administration may be limited in this patient population in the presence of clinical hypervolemia with associated portal hypertension.
Endocrine	A myriad of metabolic perturbations may be present in the liver transplant recipient. Hypoglycemia is common in patients with advanced disease, due to impairment in gluconeogenesis. Patients may require supplementation with dextrose prior to surgery. A sign of graft function in the neohepatic phase, is hyperglycemia/insulin requirement in response to steroid administration. Patients often present with impaired temperature regulation resulting in hypothermia, prior to reperfusion of the new graft. As previously detailed, careful attention to application of external body warmers and warmed fluid administration, is essential to maintain normothermia and optimize hemostatic conditions. On occasion, patients with severe portal hypertension may also present with hyponatremia. This can occur as a result of altered renal free water handling/elimination and water retention resulting from activation of ADH in the setting of splanchnic vasodilation. These derangements may be exacerbated by concomitant sodium dietary restriction and use of diuretic therapy. Rapid correction of sodium intra-operatively should be avoided, to reduce clinical risk of CPM. This may involve supplementation of solute-rich colloid administration with hypotonic fluids intra-operatively, to maintain baseline sodium levels.
ID	Patients with end-stage liver disease are at high risk of infections. Altered hepatic clearance and dysregulation of Kupffer cell function, combined with poor underlying nutritional status, result in a functional immunocompromised state. Not uncommonly, these patients are treated, at the time of transplant, for biliary infections, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), aspiration pneumonia, or cellulitis. Active septicemia or severe infection without treatment/source control, are contraindications to transplant. Appropriate selection of antimicrobials is necessary, and should be guided by infection source, probable or confirmed infectious pathogens, and patient history (previous infectious culprits/colonization). Standard antimicrobial prophylaxis is: cefazolin/metronidazole, or cefotetan. If there is concern for SBP at the time of transplantation, or if donor variables present concerns for possible infection/contamination, antimicrobial selection should be adjusted accordingly. Re-dosing of antibiotics should be guided by agent selection, blood loss, and recipient renal function.

Labs and studies

• Full workup prior to transplant.
• CBC
• CMP
• Coagulation panel
• CXR
• EKG
• Cardiac evaluation possibly including stress test or TTE

Operating room setup

• Alaris brain with multiple channels -- Possible infusions include: Vasopressin, Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Insulin, Carrier fluid, Antibiotics, Calcium Chloride
• Belmont or Level 1 Rapid Infuser for aggressive resuscitation

Patient preparation and premedication

• Generally sedative premedication is avoided due to patient susceptibility to exacerbation of underlying hepatic encephalopathy.

Regional and neuraxial techniques

• Avoided due to coagulopathy.

Intraoperative management

Monitoring and access

• Large bore PIVs
• arterial line (at some institutions it is common to place two arterial lines)
• Central access (often large-bore volume line and an infusion line).
  • Common practice can include introducer catheter for volume and a triple lumen catheter for infusions.
  • CVP monitoring.
• Intraoperative TEE and/or pulmonary artery catheter are routine in many centers

Induction and airway management

• Increased intra-abdominal pressure and high probability of gastroparesis necessitate rapid sequence induction.
• Induction dose of propofol should be reduced in patients with severe liver disease due to altered pharmacodynamics (low albumin level), and increased sensitivity.
• Non depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents should be chosen with patients organ function in mind. Often Cis-atricurium is chosen due to its predictable metabolism.

Positioning

• Supine

Maintenance and surgical considerations

• Anesthetic requirements for patients with end-stage liver disease will often be reduced, due to underlying cerebral disturbances.
• Mental status may be further depressed by coexisting metabolic derangements, including hyponatremia and hypoglycemia.
• Limited hepatic clearance of various toxins, such as ammonia, can lead to alterations in endogenous neurotransmitters and neuro-signaling pathways, largely involving y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate and nitric oxide.
• Reperfusion is typically most complicated step, as old ischemic liver blood rushes into the new patient's bloodstream, causing hypotension, bradycardia, RV stunning. Treating with baby epinephrine pushes is common (10 mcg/mL syringe, several cc's at a time).

Postoperative management

Disposition

• ICU
  • Generally patients require additional fluid resuscitation and/or blood products.
  • Frequent monitoring of hemoglobin, fibrinogen, glucose, and phosphate is required.
  • Renal duplex ultrasound is also needed.

Pain management

• PCA, typically fentanyl or hydromorphone
• Consider acetaminophen after communication with transplant team

Potential complications

• These patients are at risk for further clinical deterioration post-operatively, as graft function improves and SVR normalizes, resulting in increased afterload to a susceptible myocardium. Careful extended monitoring should be considered.

Procedure variants

	Variant 1	Variant 2
Unique considerations
Position
Surgical time
EBL
Postoperative disposition
Pain management
Potential complications