Difference between revisions of "Esophagectomy"
Nirav Kamdar (talk | contribs) |
Nirav Kamdar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| monitors = Standard monitors | | monitors = Standard monitors | ||
Invasive hemdynamic | Invasive hemdynamic | ||
+/- | +/- Flowtrac | ||
| considerations_preoperative = | | considerations_preoperative = | ||
| considerations_intraoperative = One-lung ventilation | | considerations_intraoperative = One-lung ventilation | ||
Revision as of 07:48, 5 November 2021
| Anesthesia type |
General |
|---|---|
| Airway |
DLT / SLT + Bronchial blocker |
| Lines and access |
Large bore PIV NGT Arterial Line |
| Monitors |
Standard monitors Invasive hemdynamic +/- Flowtrac |
| Primary anesthetic considerations | |
| Preoperative | |
| Intraoperative |
One-lung ventilation |
| Postoperative |
Aspiration Vocal cord paresis Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury Operative mortality |
| Article quality | |
| Editor rating | |
| User likes | 0 |
An esophagectomy remains a formidable surgery with high morbidity and mortality.[1] It is performed for esophageal cancer and non-malignant conditions including hiatal hernias, severe GERD refractory to medical management, esophageal strictures and diverticula, and dysmotility disorders such as achalasia.[1] Anesthetic management may contribute to the improvement of perioperative outcomes; such factors include prevention of tracheal aspiration, lung protective ventilatory strategies, thoracic epidural analgesia, judicious fluid management to optimize tissue oxygen delivery, and attention to issues that may reduce anastomotic complications.[2]
Esophageal cancer incidence has been increasing and is now the eighth most common malignancy worldwide. Despite overall poor prognosis with this malignancy, surgery plays a significant role to increase long-term survival and possible cure. Multiple variations of surgical approaches are described in the literature including Ivor Lewis (IL)[3], McKeown, and transhiatal (TH). While an open approach was used traditionally, surgeons have more recently favored minimally invasive, thoracoscopic, approaches including robotic techniques. Minimally invasive approaches allow for direct visualization within the thoracic cavity to reduce chances of injury during dissection and have reduced the pulmonary complications and hastened the recovery period.
Preoperative management
Patient evaluation
| System | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Neurologic | |
| Cardiovascular | Oxygen consumption increases 50% in the immediate post-op period. Patients need to be able to increase cardiac output and oxygen delivery after surgery. |
| Respiratory | Evaluate smoking history and underlying pulmonary dysfunction |
| Gastrointestinal | Patients have passive reflux following esophagectomy. |
| Hematologic | |
| Renal | |
| Endocrine | |
| Other |
Labs and studies
Operating room setup
Patient preparation and premedication
Regional and neuraxial techniques
- Thoracic epidural
Intraoperative management
Monitoring and access
- Invasive hemodynamic monitoring
- Large bore IV access
Induction and airway management
- May consider RSI if high-aspiration risk due to esophageal tumor obstructing food passage
- Left sided double lumen tube or single lumen ETT with bronchial blocker for one lung ventilation
Positioning
- Ivor Lewis: Start supine position for abdominal thorascopic approach and change to left lateral decubitus for thoracic anastamosis
- Transhiatal: Supine
Maintenance and surgical considerations
Abdominal Dissection
- Pt is placed supine and peritoneal cavity is examined for metastatic disease
- Lower portion of the stomach is mobilized
- Gastric conduit formed
- A cervical anastomosis is performed and esophagus and stomach returned to mediastinum
Emergence
Postoperative management
Disposition
- ICU
- Step-down unit for Enhanced-Recovery cases
Pain management
- Epidural management
Potential complications
- Anastomotic leak
- Vocal cord paresis
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
- Post-operative atrial fibrillation[4]
- Morbidity requiring re-operation
- Mortality
Procedure variants
| Open | Thoracoscopic | Robotic | Ivor Lewis | McKeown | Transhiatal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unique considerations | ||||||
| Position | ||||||
| Surgical time | ||||||
| EBL | ||||||
| Postoperative disposition | ||||||
| Pain management | ||||||
| Potential complications |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Ng, Ju-Mei (2008-06). "Perioperative Anesthetic Management for Esophagectomy". Anesthesiology Clinics. 26 (2): 293–304. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2008.01.004. ISSN 1932-2275. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Jaeger, J. Michael; Collins, Stephen R.; Blank, Randal S. (2012-12). "Anesthetic Management for Esophageal Resection". Anesthesiology Clinics. 30 (4): 731–747. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2012.08.005. ISSN 1932-2275. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Lewis, I. (1946-07). "The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third". The British Journal of Surgery. 34: 18–31. doi:10.1002/bjs.18003413304. ISSN 0007-1323. PMID 20994128. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Carney, Adam; Dickinson, Matt (2015-03). "Anesthesia for esophagectomy". Anesthesiology Clinics. 33 (1): 143–163. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.009. ISSN 1932-2275. PMID 25701933. Check date values in:
|date=(help)