Difference between revisions of "Transhiatal esophagectomy"
From WikiAnesthesia
Nirav Kamdar (talk | contribs) |
Chris Rishel (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|Respiratory" to "|Pulmonary") |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The transhiatal approach is used with a laparotomy below the xiphisternum to mobilize the stomach and create an esophageal conduit from the greater curvature of the stomach. This conduit is brought up to the neck for a gastroesophageal anastamosis at the level of a neck incision.<ref name=":1">{{Citation|last=Nottingham|first=James M.|title=Transhiatal Esophagectomy|date=2021|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559196/|work=StatPearls|place=Treasure Island (FL)|publisher=StatPearls Publishing|pmid=32644622|access-date=2021-06-17|last2=McKeown|first2=David G.}}</ref> With advances in laparoscopic and robotic surgical techniques, the transhiatal esophagestomy has been increasing in popularity once again. | |||
== Preoperative management == | == Preoperative management == | ||
Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Pulmonary | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 77: | Line 76: | ||
* Supine with both arms tucked | * Supine with both arms tucked | ||
=== Maintenance and surgical considerations | === Maintenance and surgical considerations === | ||
===== Abdominal laparoscopy: ===== | |||
===== Gastric conduit creation: ===== | |||
===== Esophageal transection: ===== | |||
===== Gastric pull-through: ===== | |||
* Watch peak and plateau pressures for signs of pneumothorax | |||
* Compression of RA may cause sudden hypotension | |||
===== Anastamosis: ===== | |||
* Avoid excessive vasopressors to uphold integrity of anastamosis site | |||
=== Emergence<!-- List and/or describe any important considerations related to the emergence from anesthesia for this case. --> === | === Emergence<!-- List and/or describe any important considerations related to the emergence from anesthesia for this case. --> === | ||
Line 88: | Line 102: | ||
=== Potential complications<!-- List and/or describe any potential postoperative complications for this case. --> === | === Potential complications<!-- List and/or describe any potential postoperative complications for this case. --> === | ||
* Vocal cord palsy | |||
* Anastamotic leak | |||
* General pulmonary failure/complications | |||
== Procedure variants<!-- This section should only be used for cases with multiple approaches (e.g. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy). Otherwise, remove this section. Use this table to very briefly compare and contrast various aspects between approaches. Add or remove rows as needed to maximize relevance. Consider using symbols rather than words when possible (e.g. +, –, additional symbols such as ↑ and ↓ are available using the "Ω" tool in the editor). --> == | == Procedure variants<!-- This section should only be used for cases with multiple approaches (e.g. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy). Otherwise, remove this section. Use this table to very briefly compare and contrast various aspects between approaches. Add or remove rows as needed to maximize relevance. Consider using symbols rather than words when possible (e.g. +, –, additional symbols such as ↑ and ↓ are available using the "Ω" tool in the editor). --> == | ||
Line 93: | Line 111: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||
* Very few series have been published comparing robotic and laparoscopic approach. | |||
! | ! | ||
!Laparoscopic | !Laparoscopic | ||
Line 102: | Line 121: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Position | |Position | ||
| | |Supine | ||
| | |Supine; arms tucked | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Surgical time | |Surgical time | ||
| | |279min<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Seto|first=Yasuyuki|last2=Mori|first2=Kazuhiko|last3=Aikou|first3=Susumu|date=2017-09|title=Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: Merits and demerits|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29863149|journal=Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery|volume=1|issue=3|pages=193–198|doi=10.1002/ags3.12028|issn=2475-0328|pmc=5881348|pmid=29863149}}</ref> | ||
| | |267-311min | ||
|- | |- | ||
|EBL | |EBL | ||
| | |88mL<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| | |54-100mL | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Postoperative disposition | |Postoperative disposition | ||
Line 119: | Line 138: | ||
|Pain management | |Pain management | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Epidural | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Potential complications | |Potential complications | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Pulmonary | ||
Anastamotic leak (9-33%) | |||
Vocal cord palsy (5-30%) | |||
|- | |||
|Length of Stay | |||
|9.2 days<ref name=":0" /> | |||
|9-10 days | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:46, 21 February 2022
Transhiatal esophagectomy
Anesthesia type |
General |
---|---|
Airway |
8-O ETT |
Lines and access |
Large bore PIV Arterial Line NG-tube |
Monitors |
Standard Arterial Line |
Primary anesthetic considerations | |
Preoperative | |
Intraoperative | |
Postoperative |
Anastamotic leak |
Article quality | |
Editor rating | |
User likes | 0 |
The transhiatal approach is used with a laparotomy below the xiphisternum to mobilize the stomach and create an esophageal conduit from the greater curvature of the stomach. This conduit is brought up to the neck for a gastroesophageal anastamosis at the level of a neck incision.[1] With advances in laparoscopic and robotic surgical techniques, the transhiatal esophagestomy has been increasing in popularity once again.
Preoperative management
Patient evaluation
System | Considerations |
---|---|
Neurologic | |
Cardiovascular | |
Pulmonary | |
Gastrointestinal | |
Hematologic | |
Renal | |
Endocrine | |
Other |
Labs and studies
Operating room setup
- 8-O ETT for periemergence bronchoscopy
- Arterial line
- Large bore peripheral IV
- NG tube to decompress stomach
Patient preparation and premedication
- EKG leads on back of shoulders to facilitate neck prep
Regional and neuraxial techniques
- Epidural for post-operative pain control
Intraoperative management
Monitoring and access
- Standard ASA Monitors
- Arterial line
Induction and airway management
Positioning
- Supine with both arms tucked
Maintenance and surgical considerations
Abdominal laparoscopy:
Gastric conduit creation:
Esophageal transection:
Gastric pull-through:
- Watch peak and plateau pressures for signs of pneumothorax
- Compression of RA may cause sudden hypotension
Anastamosis:
- Avoid excessive vasopressors to uphold integrity of anastamosis site
Emergence
Postoperative management
Disposition
Pain management
Potential complications
- Vocal cord palsy
- Anastamotic leak
- General pulmonary failure/complications
Procedure variants
Laparoscopic | Robotic | |
---|---|---|
Unique considerations | ||
Position | Supine | Supine; arms tucked |
Surgical time | 279min[2] | 267-311min |
EBL | 88mL[2] | 54-100mL |
Postoperative disposition | ||
Pain management | Epidural | |
Potential complications | Pulmonary
Anastamotic leak (9-33%) Vocal cord palsy (5-30%) | |
Length of Stay | 9.2 days[2] | 9-10 days |
References
- ↑ Nottingham, James M.; McKeown, David G. (2021), "Transhiatal Esophagectomy", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 32644622, retrieved 2021-06-17
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Seto, Yasuyuki; Mori, Kazuhiko; Aikou, Susumu (2017-09). "Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: Merits and demerits". Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery. 1 (3): 193–198. doi:10.1002/ags3.12028. ISSN 2475-0328. PMC 5881348. PMID 29863149. Check date values in:
|date=
(help)
Top contributors: Nirav Kamdar, Elmar Malek and Chris Rishel