Difference between revisions of "Surgery for pleural mesothelioma"

From WikiAnesthesia
Line 1: Line 1:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease, is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and has a 5-year survival rate of only 5 to 10%.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Janes|first=Sam M.|last2=Alrifai|first2=Doraid|last3=Fennell|first3=Dean A.|date=2021-09-23|editor-last=Longo|editor-first=Dan L.|title=Perspectives on the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma|url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1912719|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|language=en|volume=385|issue=13|pages=1207–1218|doi=10.1056/NEJMra1912719|issn=0028-4793}}</ref> The most important risk factor for its development
{{Infobox surgical procedure
{{Infobox surgical procedure
| anesthesia_type = General
| anesthesia_type = General
Line 10: Line 7:
| considerations_intraoperative = vasoplegia; colloid infusion requirements
| considerations_intraoperative = vasoplegia; colloid infusion requirements
| considerations_postoperative = Extended post-op hypotension and fluid shifts; large post-operative air leaks from chest tubes
| considerations_postoperative = Extended post-op hypotension and fluid shifts; large post-operative air leaks from chest tubes
}}
}}Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease, is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and has a 5-year survival rate of only 5 to 10%.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Janes|first=Sam M.|last2=Alrifai|first2=Doraid|last3=Fennell|first3=Dean A.|date=2021-09-23|editor-last=Longo|editor-first=Dan L.|title=Perspectives on the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma|url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1912719|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|language=en|volume=385|issue=13|pages=1207–1218|doi=10.1056/NEJMra1912719|issn=0028-4793}}</ref> The most important risk factor for its development is exposure to asbestos; the transformation of work practices worldwide has led to a modest decline in incidence. The three primary histologic types are epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic or mixed histology, with epithelioid resulting in more favorable outcomes than sarcomatoid or mixed histology.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Neragi-Miandoab|first=Siyamek|last2=Richards|first2=William G.|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=David J.|date=2008-08-01|title=Morbidity, mortality, mean survival, and the impact of histology on survival after pleurectomy in 64 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919108000605|journal=International Journal of Surgery|language=en|volume=6|issue=4|pages=293–297|doi=10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.004|issn=1743-9191}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vigneswaran|first=Wickii T.|last2=Kircheva|first2=Diana Y.|last3=Ananthanarayanan|first3=Vijayalakshimi|last4=Watson|first4=Sydeaka|last5=Arif|first5=Qudsia|last6=Celauro|first6=Amy Durkin|last7=Kindler|first7=Hedy L.|last8=Husain|first8=Aliya N.|date=March 1, 2017|title=Amount of Epithelioid Differentiation Is a Predictor of Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma|url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003497516311316|journal=The Annals of Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=103|issue=3|pages=962–966|doi=10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.063|via=}}</ref>
 
is exposure to asbestos; the transformation of work practices worldwide has led to a modest decline in incidence. The three primary histologic types are epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic or mixed histology, with epithelioid resulting in more favorable outcomes than sarcomatoid or mixed histology.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Neragi-Miandoab|first=Siyamek|last2=Richards|first2=William G.|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=David J.|date=2008-08-01|title=Morbidity, mortality, mean survival, and the impact of histology on survival after pleurectomy in 64 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919108000605|journal=International Journal of Surgery|language=en|volume=6|issue=4|pages=293–297|doi=10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.004|issn=1743-9191}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vigneswaran|first=Wickii T.|last2=Kircheva|first2=Diana Y.|last3=Ananthanarayanan|first3=Vijayalakshimi|last4=Watson|first4=Sydeaka|last5=Arif|first5=Qudsia|last6=Celauro|first6=Amy Durkin|last7=Kindler|first7=Hedy L.|last8=Husain|first8=Aliya N.|date=March 1, 2017|title=Amount of Epithelioid Differentiation Is a Predictor of Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma|url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003497516311316|journal=The Annals of Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=103|issue=3|pages=962–966|doi=10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.063|via=}}</ref>


One of two operations is performed:  extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). EPP is the radical en bloc resection of the lung, pleura, diaphragm, and pericardium. P/D is a lung-sparing but still radical procedure in which the diseased pleural envelope that encases and constricts the lung is dissected from the chest wall, mediastinum, diaphram, and pericardium, and then is stripped from the surface of the lung.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wolf|first=Andrea S.|last2=Daniel|first2=Jonathan|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=David J.|date=2009-06-01|title=Surgical Techniques for Multimodality Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy/Decortication|url=https://www.semthorcardiovascsurg.com/article/S1043-0679(09)00084-7/abstract|journal=Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery|language=English|volume=21|issue=2|pages=132–148|doi=10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.07.007|issn=1043-0679|pmid=19822285}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ng|first=Ju-Mei|last2=Hartigan|first2=Philip M.|date=February 1, 2008|title=Anesthetic management of patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for mesothelioma|url=https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/Abstract/2008/02000/Anesthetic_management_of_patients_undergoing.6.aspx|journal=Current Opinion in Anesthesiology|language=en-US|volume=21|issue=1|pages=21–27|doi=10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f2a9c3|issn=0952-7907|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vlahu|first=Tedi|last2=Vigneswaran|first2=Wicki T.|date=June 1, 2017|title=Pleurectomy and decortication|url=http://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/14825/15364|journal=Annals of Translational Medicine|volume=5|issue=11|pages=246–246|doi=10.21037/atm.2017.04.03|pmc=PMC5497109|pmid=28706914|via=}}</ref>P/D is the more frequently used approach as of this writing as EPP has shown no survival advantage and patients experience improved quality of life when the lung remains intact.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Infante|first=Maurizio|last2=Morenghi|first2=Emanuela|last3=Bottoni|first3=Edoardo|last4=Zucali|first4=Paolo|last5=Rahal|first5=Daoud|last6=Morlacchi|first6=Andrea|last7=Ascolese|first7=Anna Maria|last8=De Rose|first8=Fiorenza|last9=Navarria|first9=Pierina|last10=Crepaldi|first10=Alessandro|last11=Testori|first11=Alberto|date=December 1, 2016|title=Comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezw215|journal=European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=50|issue=6|pages=1077–1082|doi=10.1093/ejcts/ezw215|issn=1010-7940|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sugarbaker|first=David J|last2=Wolf|first2=Andrea S|date=June 1, 2010|title=Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/ers.10.35|journal=Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine|language=en|volume=4|issue=3|pages=363–372|doi=10.1586/ers.10.35|issn=1747-6348|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Neragi-Miandoab|first=S.|last2=Weiner|first2=S.|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=D. J.|date=2008-12-01|title=Incidence of atrial fibrillation after extrapleural pneumonectomy vs. pleurectomy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article-lookup/doi/10.1510/icvts.2008.181099|journal=Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=7|issue=6|pages=1039–1042|doi=10.1510/icvts.2008.181099|issn=1569-9293}}</ref>
One of two operations is performed:  extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). EPP is the radical en bloc resection of the lung, pleura, diaphragm, and pericardium. P/D is a lung-sparing but still radical procedure in which the diseased pleural envelope that encases and constricts the lung is dissected from the chest wall, mediastinum, diaphram, and pericardium, and then is stripped from the surface of the lung.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wolf|first=Andrea S.|last2=Daniel|first2=Jonathan|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=David J.|date=2009-06-01|title=Surgical Techniques for Multimodality Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy/Decortication|url=https://www.semthorcardiovascsurg.com/article/S1043-0679(09)00084-7/abstract|journal=Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery|language=English|volume=21|issue=2|pages=132–148|doi=10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.07.007|issn=1043-0679|pmid=19822285}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ng|first=Ju-Mei|last2=Hartigan|first2=Philip M.|date=February 1, 2008|title=Anesthetic management of patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for mesothelioma|url=https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/Abstract/2008/02000/Anesthetic_management_of_patients_undergoing.6.aspx|journal=Current Opinion in Anesthesiology|language=en-US|volume=21|issue=1|pages=21–27|doi=10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f2a9c3|issn=0952-7907|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vlahu|first=Tedi|last2=Vigneswaran|first2=Wicki T.|date=June 1, 2017|title=Pleurectomy and decortication|url=http://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/14825/15364|journal=Annals of Translational Medicine|volume=5|issue=11|pages=246–246|doi=10.21037/atm.2017.04.03|pmc=PMC5497109|pmid=28706914|via=}}</ref>P/D is the more frequently used approach as of this writing as EPP has shown no survival advantage and patients experience improved quality of life when the lung remains intact.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Infante|first=Maurizio|last2=Morenghi|first2=Emanuela|last3=Bottoni|first3=Edoardo|last4=Zucali|first4=Paolo|last5=Rahal|first5=Daoud|last6=Morlacchi|first6=Andrea|last7=Ascolese|first7=Anna Maria|last8=De Rose|first8=Fiorenza|last9=Navarria|first9=Pierina|last10=Crepaldi|first10=Alessandro|last11=Testori|first11=Alberto|date=December 1, 2016|title=Comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezw215|journal=European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=50|issue=6|pages=1077–1082|doi=10.1093/ejcts/ezw215|issn=1010-7940|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sugarbaker|first=David J|last2=Wolf|first2=Andrea S|date=June 1, 2010|title=Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/ers.10.35|journal=Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine|language=en|volume=4|issue=3|pages=363–372|doi=10.1586/ers.10.35|issn=1747-6348|via=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Neragi-Miandoab|first=S.|last2=Weiner|first2=S.|last3=Sugarbaker|first3=D. J.|date=2008-12-01|title=Incidence of atrial fibrillation after extrapleural pneumonectomy vs. pleurectomy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma|url=https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article-lookup/doi/10.1510/icvts.2008.181099|journal=Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery|language=en|volume=7|issue=6|pages=1039–1042|doi=10.1510/icvts.2008.181099|issn=1569-9293}}</ref>

Revision as of 18:52, 7 November 2021

Surgery for pleural mesothelioma
Anesthesia type

General

Airway

Double-lumen tube; CPAP and PEEP control equipment

Lines and access

Arterial line +/- flow monitoring equipment (i.e. Flotrac); Large bore peripheral access

Monitors

Standard; blood gas monitoring

Primary anesthetic considerations
Preoperative

Cardiac testing and prehabilitation

Intraoperative

vasoplegia; colloid infusion requirements

Postoperative

Extended post-op hypotension and fluid shifts; large post-operative air leaks from chest tubes

Article quality
Editor rating
Unrated
User likes
0

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease, is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and has a 5-year survival rate of only 5 to 10%.[1] The most important risk factor for its development is exposure to asbestos; the transformation of work practices worldwide has led to a modest decline in incidence. The three primary histologic types are epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic or mixed histology, with epithelioid resulting in more favorable outcomes than sarcomatoid or mixed histology.[2][3]

One of two operations is performed: extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). EPP is the radical en bloc resection of the lung, pleura, diaphragm, and pericardium. P/D is a lung-sparing but still radical procedure in which the diseased pleural envelope that encases and constricts the lung is dissected from the chest wall, mediastinum, diaphram, and pericardium, and then is stripped from the surface of the lung.[4][5][6]P/D is the more frequently used approach as of this writing as EPP has shown no survival advantage and patients experience improved quality of life when the lung remains intact.[7][8][9]

Currently a multi-center trial, MARS 2, is ongoing in the UK to test the hypothesis that P/D and chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone with respect to overall survival for patients with pleural mesothelioma. The trial will also examine a range of secondary outcomes including adverse health events and cost-effectiveness. If the results of this trial are negative, there will be reason to question if radical surgery, as opposed to palliative procedures such as PleurX catheter insertion, should continue to have a role in the treatment of mesothelioma.[10]

This article will focus on the anesthetic management of radical pleurectomy/decortication, which is done via open thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation by double-lumen endotracheal tube. These procedures may last for eight hours or more, and typically involve substantial blood and fluid loss. Most centers send patients directly to ICU whether or not extubation is possible at the conclusion of surgery.

Preoperative management

Patients may present for P/D with substantial disease burden including decreased lung function on the affected side, pleural or pericardial effusion, anemia, poor nutritional status, and effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whenever possible, prehabilitation in preparation for surgery should be considered to correct anemia, improve nutritional status, and improve functional capacity.

Patient evaluation

System Considerations
Cardiovascular Consider stress testing, echocardiography; look for evidence of ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, right heart strain from tumor involvement of pericardium
Hematologic Hypercoagulability due to underlying malignancy
Respiratory Pulmonary function testing; CT scan to evaluate extent of lung compression on the operative side, extent of pleural effusion
Neurologic Peripheral neuropathy due to chemotherapy; assess appropriateness for epidural analgesia
Renal Preexisting renal disease may worsen under stress of fluid shifts, blood loss, potential hypotension

Operating room setup

The operating room setup will be for open thoracotomy with an operating room table that can be flexed. A checklist for equipment and supplies typically will include:

  1. Double-lumen endotracheal tube
  2. Fiberoptic bronchoscope
  3. Video laryngoscope
  4. Arterial line setup and transducer
  5. Consider flow parameter monitoring (e.g. FloTrac system, Edwards Lifesciences)
  6. IV fluid warming device
  7. Infusion pumps for vasoactive infusion
  8. Availability of cross-matched blood, albumin
  9. CPAP equipment with airflow and PEEP control

Patient preparation and premedication

Patients should fast per institutional guidelines. Premedication is at the choice of the anesthesiologist depending on the patient's age and other relevant factors.

Regional and neuraxial techniques

Thoracic epidural analgesia is highly recommended as it will benefit the patient's ability to breathe comfortably and resume mobility after the extensive thoracotomy required for radical mesothelioma resection.

The epidural catheter should be inserted at a high enough level that the patient will not have any lumbar motor block and can safely ambulate. Insertion prior to surgery offers the advantage of beginning epidural infusion before the patient emerges from anesthesia.

As there will be continuous blood and fluid loss throughout surgery, it may be preferred not to give any bolus dose or epidural infusion until near the end of surgery to avoid the hypotensive effect of sympathectomy. This decision must be weighed against the potential analgesic value of preemptive dosing.

If the patient has a contraindication to epidural catheter placement, other regional techniques may be considered: lumbar spinal opioid analgesia, erector spinae plane block [11], intercostal or paravertebral blocks.

Intraoperative management

Monitoring and access

  1. Arterial monitoring is highly recommended for continuous blood pressure monitoring and blood gas measurement. Consider use of a flow parameter monitoring transducer (e.g. FloTrac, Edwards Lifesciences).
  2. Large-bore IV access is indicated; central venous access is not mandatory unless peripheral veins are inadequate.

Induction and airway management

  1. Induction medications and muscle relaxant choice per anesthesiologist preference. Ketamine may be a useful adjunct, especially for patients with chronic pain or a history of preoperative opioid use.
  2. A double-lumen endotracheal tube (typically 37-39 Fr) is inserted and position confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Positioning

The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with the table flexed. No position changes are usually necessary during the operation.

Maintenance and surgical considerations

The choice of maintenance anesthetic is per anesthesiologist preference; inhaled agents offer the advantage of bronchodilation. Muscle relaxation is continued throughout the procedure.

Lung protective ventilation strategies are recommended:

  • Tidal volume 4-6 ml/kg on one-lung ventilation
  • Permissive hypercapnia if necessary
  • PEEP to the nonoperative lung

Regular blood gas measurement helps in the assessment of blood loss, volume status, and electrolyte balance. The development of metabolic acidosis may be a valuable indicator of volume deficit. For diabetic patients, insulin infusion may be helpful. The surgeon may use intermittent irrigation of the plane of dissection with sterile water to aid in lysis of adhesions, so careful attention must be paid to distinguish irrigation fluid from accumulated blood loss.

During dissection and decortication of the visceral pleura from the lung surface, the surgeon may request reinflation of the lung and maintenance of partial inflation with continuous CPAP at a range of 5-20 cm H20. A CPAP/PEEP valve connected to an auxiliary oxygen source is used at the flow rate requested by the surgeon. Avoid attaching oxygen tubing directly to a double-lumen tube without a CPAP valve as this can lead to over-inflation and barotrauma to the lung.

During dissection, venous return may be impeded by compression from retractors and by blunt dissection pressure. It may be tempting to correct preload with crystalloid volume expansion. However, albumin, vasopressors, and blood products may be more helpful in optimizing volume status until the specimen is removed.

Blood loss may not be obvious as it pools in the chest cavity.

Coagulation parameters (PT/PTT/INR), platelet count, and fibrinogen should be assessed as surgery progresses, typically after transfusion of 2-4 units of PRBC. The use of FFP and platelets may be necessary. Cryoprecipitate, recombinant clotting factors, and Factor VII have been required in some cases.

It is not uncommon to see vasoplegia or the apparent development of a systemic inflammatory response during mesothelioma resection, resulting in refractory hypotension despite adequate volume replacement. Blood pressure support with phenylephrine or norepinephrine frequently is needed.

Emergence

If the operative lung has a large air leak, it may be necessary to maintain positive pressure ventilation on the dependent lung until the patient begins to breathe spontaneously.

Bronchoscopy and bronchial lavage may be helpful near the end of surgery to clear blood or secretions from the upper airways.

As air leaks are common, it is preferable to extubate at the conclusion of surgery in order to avoid worsening the air leaks in the operative lung.

As the level of general anesthesia is lightened, the epidural catheter may be activated either by bolus or continuous infusion, per clinician preference.

If the pericardium was involved with tumor and pericardiectomy was performed, herniation of the heart with torsion of the great vessels and circulatory arrest may abruptly occur upon turning the patient to the supine position at the end of surgery. This is more common in right-sided cases. The immediate return to the lateral position is the appropriate response.

Postoperative management

Disposition

At most centers, patients are transferred to intensive care after surgery for mesothelioma resection unless the procedure was a minimal palliative intervention. A step-down unit may be appropriate in some cases. Many patients continue to require vasopressor support in the initial period of post-extubation recovery.

Pain management

Continuous epidural thoracic analgesia is the most common method used, with a combination of low-dose local anesthetic (e.g. bupivacaine, ropivacaine) and narcotic (e.g. fentanyl, hydromorphone). A low-dose ketamine infusion may be helpful in the management of opioid-tolerant patients. If hypotension is problematic, local anesthetic can be eliminated from the epidural infusion.

Potential complications

The most frequent major complications of pleurectomy/decortication are respiratory failure (2.3–7.1%), bleeding (0.0–16.7%), and prolonged air leak (7.1–23.5%). However, as with other thoracic surgeries, atrial fibrillation (2.3–21.4%, higher risk in age > 65), myocardial infarction, DVT/PE, pneumonia, acute renal failure, empyema, pleural sepsis, prolonged intubation, UTI, and wound infections may also be seen.

Immediate postoperative bleeding may occur due to extensive raw surface oozing. It is best managed by correcting any coagulopathy and with increased PEEP on the ventilator if the patient is intubated.

Delayed hemorrhage 8-10 hours postoperatively is often due to unopposed regional hyperfibrinolysis and consumptive coagulopathy after removal of the hypercoagulable tumor. Treatment with aminocaproic acid has been utilized in this setting. ROTEM monitoring can aid in the diagnosis of fibrinolysis.

The pleural space is monitored with serial chest X-rays. Prolonged air leak is common and is managed by maintaining chest tubes on mild suction, then weaning to water seal, and finally using pneumostats for portability if needed.

References

  1. Janes, Sam M.; Alrifai, Doraid; Fennell, Dean A. (2021-09-23). Longo, Dan L. (ed.). "Perspectives on the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma". New England Journal of Medicine. 385 (13): 1207–1218. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1912719. ISSN 0028-4793.
  2. Neragi-Miandoab, Siyamek; Richards, William G.; Sugarbaker, David J. (2008-08-01). "Morbidity, mortality, mean survival, and the impact of histology on survival after pleurectomy in 64 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma". International Journal of Surgery. 6 (4): 293–297. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.004. ISSN 1743-9191.
  3. Vigneswaran, Wickii T.; Kircheva, Diana Y.; Ananthanarayanan, Vijayalakshimi; Watson, Sydeaka; Arif, Qudsia; Celauro, Amy Durkin; Kindler, Hedy L.; Husain, Aliya N. (March 1, 2017). "Amount of Epithelioid Differentiation Is a Predictor of Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma". The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 103 (3): 962–966. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.063.
  4. Wolf, Andrea S.; Daniel, Jonathan; Sugarbaker, David J. (2009-06-01). "Surgical Techniques for Multimodality Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy/Decortication". Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 21 (2): 132–148. doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.07.007. ISSN 1043-0679. PMID 19822285.
  5. Ng, Ju-Mei; Hartigan, Philip M. (February 1, 2008). "Anesthetic management of patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for mesothelioma". Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 21 (1): 21–27. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f2a9c3. ISSN 0952-7907.
  6. Vlahu, Tedi; Vigneswaran, Wicki T. (June 1, 2017). "Pleurectomy and decortication". Annals of Translational Medicine. 5 (11): 246–246. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.04.03. PMC 5497109. PMID 28706914.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  7. Infante, Maurizio; Morenghi, Emanuela; Bottoni, Edoardo; Zucali, Paolo; Rahal, Daoud; Morlacchi, Andrea; Ascolese, Anna Maria; De Rose, Fiorenza; Navarria, Pierina; Crepaldi, Alessandro; Testori, Alberto (December 1, 2016). "Comorbidity, postoperative morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma". European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 50 (6): 1077–1082. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw215. ISSN 1010-7940.
  8. Sugarbaker, David J; Wolf, Andrea S (June 1, 2010). "Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma". Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 4 (3): 363–372. doi:10.1586/ers.10.35. ISSN 1747-6348.
  9. Neragi-Miandoab, S.; Weiner, S.; Sugarbaker, D. J. (2008-12-01). "Incidence of atrial fibrillation after extrapleural pneumonectomy vs. pleurectomy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma". Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 7 (6): 1039–1042. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.181099. ISSN 1569-9293.
  10. Lim, Eric; Darlison, Liz; Edwards, John; Elliott, Daisy; Fennell, D A; Popat, Sanjay; Rintoul, Robert C; Waller, David; Ali, Clinton; Bille, Andrea; Fuller, Liz (September 1, 2020). "Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial comparing (extended) pleurectomy decortication versus no (extended) pleurectomy decortication for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma". BMJ Open. 10 (9): e038892. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038892. ISSN 2044-6055. PMC 7467531. PMID 32873681.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  11. Adhikary, SanjibDas; Pruett, Ashlee; Forero, Mauricio; Thiruvenkatarajan, Venkatesan (2018). "Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia for post-operative analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case study and a literature review on the spread of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae plane". Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 62 (1): 75. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_693_17. ISSN 0019-5049. PMC 5787896. PMID 29416155.CS1 maint: PMC format (link)